<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id" xml:lang="en">Literature of the Americas</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>Literature of the Americas</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn publication-format="print">2541-7894</issn>
      <issn publication-format="electronic">2542-243X</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name xml:lang="en">IWL RAS</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.22455/2541-7894-2021-11-155-182</article-id>
      <article-categories>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="article-type" xml:lang="en">
          <subject/>
        </subj-group>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="heading" xml:lang="en">
          <subject>Articles</subject>
        </subj-group>
      </article-categories>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Shamelessness and New Sincerity: Dostoevsky, David Foster Wallace, and Trump’s America</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group/>
      <pub-date pub-type="collection">
        <year>2021</year>
      </pub-date>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright © 2026, IWL RAS</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2026</copyright-year>
      </permissions>
      <abstract>The ascendency of Donald Trump to President of the United States was marked by the concretisation of the “post-truth” era, an era in which brazen falsehoods not only withstood counterclaims to veracity but seemed to derive their legitimacy from their opposition to readily accepted truths. Epitomised by Kellyanne Conway’s infamous promulgation of “alternative facts,” the defining characteristic of post-truth politics seemed to be that the content of an utterance mattered less than the shamelessness with which it was uttered. It evidenced a divorce between traditional concepts of sincerity and the truth on which such sincerity was traditionally premised, allowing for the post-truth manipulation of shamelessness to make the most forceful claim over the sincere. This trend, I will argue in this essay, has its roots in the abundance of cynicism that beset American postmodernism, which along with post-truth shamelessness also gave rise to the cultural need for a new understanding of sincerity. I intend to trace how Fyodor Dostoevsky’s work influenced one of the foremost proponents of such new sincerity, the novelist David Foster Wallace. Giving particular focus to Dostoevsky’s emphasis on shame in his post-Siberian works, especially in the portrayal of Fyodor Karamazov, I will argue that such emphasis has its correspondence in Emmanuel Levinas’s theorisation of the ethical. I will conclude by suggesting that Levinasian ethics, which represent a departure from the totalising tendency of Enlightenment philosophy, might thereby serve as the basis for a new type of sincerity, one that maintains a sense of the ethical in the face of post-truth shamelessness.</abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="B1">
        <label>1.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Akker, Gibbons, Vermeulen 2017 — Akker, Robin van den, Alison Gibbons, and Timotheus Vermeulen, eds. Metamodernism: Historicity, Affect, and Depth after Postmodernism. London: Roman and Littlefield, 2017.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B2">
        <label>2.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Alphen, Bal, Smith 2008 — Alphen, Ernst van, Mieke Bal, and Carel Smith, eds. The Rhetoric of Sincerity. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2008.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B3">
        <label>3.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Bakhtin 2014 — Bakhtin, Mikhail. Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics. Edited and translated by Caryl Emerson. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2014.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B4">
        <label>4.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Coetzee 2008 — Coetzee, J. M. Diary of a Bad Year. London: Vintage, 2008.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B5">
        <label>5.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Colton 2016 — Colton, Aaron. “Donald Trump and the ʻNew Sincerityʼ Artists Have</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B6">
        <label>6.</label>
        <mixed-citation>More in Common Than Either Would Like to Admit.” Paste Magazine, August 9, 2016. https://www.pastemagazine.com/politics/donald-trump-and-the-new-sincerity-artists-have-mo/.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B7">
        <label>7.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Dostoevsky 2004 — Dostoevsky, Fyodor M. The Brothers Karamazov. Translated by Richard Pevear and Larissa Volokhonsky. London: Vintage Books, 2004.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B8">
        <label>8.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Erdinast-Vulcan 2013 — Erdinast-Vulcan, Daphna. Between Philosophy and Literature: Bakhtin and the Question of the Subject. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2013.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B9">
        <label>9.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Ferguson 1997 — Ferguson, Robert A. The American Enlightenment, 1750–1820.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B10">
        <label>10.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1997.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B11">
        <label>11.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Gardiner 1997 — Gardiner, Michael. “Alterity and Ethics: A Dialogical Perspective.” Theory, Culture and Society 13, no. 2 (1996): 121–143.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B12">
        <label>12.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Jacobs 2007 — Jacobs, Timothy. “The Brothers Incandenza: Translating Ideology in Fyodor Dostoevsky’s The Brothers Karamazov and David Foster Wallace’s Infinite Jest.” Texas Studies in Literature and Language 49, no. 3 (2007): 265–292.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B13">
        <label>13.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Kelly 2010 — Kelly, Adam. “David Foster Wallace and the New Sincerity in American Fiction.” In Consider David Foster Wallace: Critical Essays, edited by David Hering, 131–146. Los Angeles: Sideshow Media Group, 2010.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B14">
        <label>14.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Kokobobo 2021 — Kokobobo, Ani. “Dostoevsky Warned of the Strain of Nihilism that Infects Donald Trump and His Movement.” The Conversation. January 13, 2021. https://theconversation.com/dostoevsky-warned-of-the-strain-of-nihilism-that-infects-donaldtrump-and-his-movement-152807.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B15">
        <label>15.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Kokobobo 2016 — Kokobobo, Ani. “How Dostoevsky Predicted Trump’s America.” The Conversation. August 23, 2016. https://theconversation.com/how-dostoevsky-predicted-trumps-america-63799.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B16">
        <label>16.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Levinas 1969 — Levinas, Emmanuel. Totality and Infinity: An Essay on Exteriority. Translated by Alphonso Lingis. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press, 1969.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B17">
        <label>17.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Levinas 2016 — Levinas, Emmanuel. Otherwise than Being, or Beyond Essence.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B18">
        <label>18.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Translated by Alphonso Lingis. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press, 2016. McGowan, Brick 2019 — McGowan, Michael, and Martin Brick, eds. David Foster Wallace and Religion: Essays on Faith and Fiction. New York: Bloomsbury Academic, 2019.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B19">
        <label>19.</label>
        <mixed-citation>McIntyre 2018 — McIntyre, Lee. Post-Truth. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2018.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B20">
        <label>20.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Martinsen 2003 — Martinsen, Deborah A. Surprised by Shame: Dostoevsky’s Liars and Narrative Exposure. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 2003.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B21">
        <label>21.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Murray 2000 — Murray, Jeffrey W. “Bakhtinian Answerability and Levinasian</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B22">
        <label>22.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Responsibility: Forging a Fuller Dialogical Communicative Ethics.” Southern Journal of Communication 65, no. 2–3 (Winter/Spring 2000): 133–150.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B23">
        <label>23.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Nealon 1988 — Nealon, Jeffrey T. “The Ethics of Dialogue: Bakhtin and Levinas.” College English 59, no. 2 (February 1997): 129–148.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B24">
        <label>24.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Patterson 1988 — Patterson, David. “Bakhtin and Levinas: Signification, Responsibility, Spirit.” In Literature and Spirit: Essays on Bakhtin and His Contemporaries, 98–127. Kentucky: University Press of Kentucky, 1988.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B25">
        <label>25.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Power 1974 — Power, Arthur. Conversations with James Joyce. Edited by Clive Hart. London: Millington, 1974.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B26">
        <label>26.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Ricoeur 2008 — Ricoeur, Paul. Freud and Philosophy: An Essay on Interpretation. Translated by Denis Savage. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass, 2008.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B27">
        <label>27.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Robbins 1999 — Robbins, Jill. Altered Reading: Levinas and Literature. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B28">
        <label>28.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Schaefer 2021 — Schaefer, Todd M. Presidential Power Meets the Art of the Deal: Applying Neustadt to the Trump Presidency. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2021.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B29">
        <label>29.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Trilling 1980 — Trilling, Lionel. Sincerity and Authenticity. London: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1980.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B30">
        <label>30.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Turner 2015 — Turner, Luke. “Metamodernism: A Brief Introduction.” Notes on Metamodernism. January 12, 2015. http://www.metamodernism.com/2015/01/12/metamodernism-a-brief-introduction </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B31">
        <label>31.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Wallace 1998 — Wallace, David Foster. “E Unibus Pluram: Television and U.S. Fiction.” In A Supposedly Fun Thing I’ll Never Do Again: Essays and Arguments, 21–82. Boston: Back Bay Books, 1998.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B32">
        <label>32.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Wallace 2012 — Wallace, David Foster. Infinite Jest. London: Abacus, 2012.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B33">
        <label>33.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Wallace 2014 — Wallace, David Foster. “Joseph Frank’s Dostoevsky.” In Consider the Lobster, and Other Essays, 255–274. London: Abacus, 2014.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B34">
        <label>34.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Williams 2015 — Williams, Iain. “(New) Sincerity in David Foster Wallace’s ‘Octet.’” Critique: Studies in Contemporary Fiction 56, no. 3 (2015): 299–314.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>
