Issue:

№5 2018

УДК / UDK: 82(092)
DOI:

10.22455/2541-7894-2018-5–102–115

Author: Natalia A. Vysotska
About the author:

Natalia A. Vysotska (Doctor Hab. in Philology, Full Professor, Kiev National Linguistic University, Ukraine)

This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. 

Abstract:

The paper sets out to explore various modes, in which cinematic code operates in the novel Juneteenth authored by the renowned (African) American writer Ralph Ellison and published posthumously in 1999. The text edited by John Callahan, his literary executor, is a section of the manuscripts of Ellison’s unfinished second “novel-in-progress”. The action in Juneteenth revolves around its core idea expressed through the plot lines, characters, imagery, as well as narrative strategies, and consisting in the writer’s belief that the fates of Blacks and whites in the USA are inextricably interwoven (it is their inseparability that accounts for America’s cultural uniqueness). The novel’s central argument is reinforced, in particular, by massive recourse to cinematic discourse. The movie code functions in Juneteenth on several textual levels. Thematically, its presence is legitimized by the twist in the story when Bliss, one of the book’s two protagonists, goes through a short-lived career in film-making before moving on to big-time politics, with both careers bringing to light his manipulative proclivities. This narrative plane called for juxtaposing two forms of “low” culture – Black church service and early American movie industry. Discussion of their common and dissimilar features is based on the propositions developed by Walter Benjamin and cinema theoreticians (Sergei Eisenstein, Yuri Tynianov, Viktor Shklovsky, Vadim Skuratovsky). Verbally re-coded cinematic techniques (camera moves, shifting point of view, montage), are, in their turn, made ample use of in the text’s narrative and spatial-temporal structure predicated upon both its semantics, and general modernist orientation of Ellison’s writings. Thus, his poetics is in line with transition to “spatial form” (J.Frank) characteristic of modernist fiction. Last but not least, cinematic semantic field is also used to mediate configurations of whiteness-blackness-power on the symbolic level of their construction.

Keywords: Ralph Ellison, Juneteenth, cinematic code, ritual, film, editing/montage, transmediality, “spatial form”
References:

Benjamin, W. “The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction.” In Benjamin, W. Illuminations. New York: Schocken: 217 – 51.

Callahan, J. “Introduction.” In Ellison, R. Juneteenth. New York: Random House, 1999: XI- XXIII.

Cohen, K. Film and Fiction: The Dynamics of Exchange. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press, 1979.

Debord, G. The Society of the Spectacle, transl. D. Nicholson-Smith. New York: Zone Books, 1994.

Eisenshtein, S. Izbrannyie proizvedeniia v shesti tomakh [Selected Writings: in 6 vols]. Vol. 3. Moscow: Iskusstvo Publ., 1964. (In Russ.)

Ellison, R. Invisible Man. New York: Vintage International, 1995.

Ellison, R. Juneteenth. New York.: Random House, 1999.

Erkkila, B. “Ethnicity, Literary Theory, and the Grounds of Resistance.” American Quarterly 47:4 (1995): 563- 94.

Fishkin, S.F. ”Interrogating ‘Whiteness’, Complicating ‘Blackness’: Remapping American Culture.” American Quarterly 47:3 (1995): 428 – 66.

Foucault, M. Power/Knowledge. Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972 – 1977. New York: Pantheon, 1980.

Frank, J. “Spatial Form in Modern Literature.” In Frank, J. The Idea of Spatial Form. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers Univ. Press, 1991; 107-33.

Hansen-Löve, A.H. "Intermedialität und Intertextualität. Probleme der Korrelation von Wort-und Bildkunst. Am Beispiel der russischen Moderne." In Dialog der Texte, eds. W. Schmid and W.-D. Stempel. Wien: Wiener Slawistischer Almanach, 1983: 291-360.

Lotman, Yu. Semiotika kino i problemy kinoestetiki. [Semiotics of the cinema and the problems of cinematographic aesthetics] Tallin: Eesti raamat, 1973. (In Russ.)

Morrison, T. “Unspeakable Things Unspoken: The Afro-American Presence in American Literature.” In Criticism and the Color Line. Desegregating American Literary Studies, ed. Henry B. Wonham. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers Univ. Press, 1996:16-29.

Mulvey L.“Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema.” Screen 16 (1975): 6 – 18.

“Notes.” In Ellison, R. Juneteenth. New York: Random House, 1999: 351-68.

Schröter, J. "Discourses and Models of Intermediality." CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture 13:3 (2011). Online at <http://dx.doi.org/10.7771/1481-4374.1790>

Shklovskii, V. Za 60 let. Raboty o kino [ Sixty Years.Works on the Cinema]. Moscow: Iskusstvo Publ., 1985. (In Russ.)

Skurativsky, V. Ekranni mystetsva u sotsiokulturnykh protsessakh XX stolittia [Art of Cinema in Socio-cultural Processes of the XXth Ccentury]. Part I. Kyiv: KMTS Poeziia Publ., 1997. (In Ukr.)

Study and Experience. An Interview with Ralph Ellison.” In Chant of Saints. A Gathering of Afro-American Literature, Art, and Scholarship, eds. Michael S. Harper, Robert B. Stepto. Urbana-Chicago-London: Univ. of Illinois Press, 1979: 451-69.

Taylor, C. “The Politics of Recognition.” In Multiculturalism. A Critical Reader, ed. D.T. Goldberg. Oxford, UK; Cambridge, MA: Blackwell, 1994:75–106.

Tynianov, Yu. Poetika. Istoriia literatury. Kino [Poetics. Literary History. Cinema]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 1977. (In Russ.)